Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Gaio vs Samuele Pieri Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Pieri analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Samuele Pieri Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gaio 0 - 0 Pieri
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 46% of points on their second serve, while Pieri has won 45.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 47.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pieri has won 51.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.04% and 37.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 54.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pieri has saved 53.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 34.15% of matches played (W/L 14/ 27), with Pieri winning 54.69% (W/L 35/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 323/ 251), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Pieri has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 73/ 45), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.48% of matches (W/L 11/ 20), where as Pieri has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.45% of matches (W/L 35/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.95 while Pieri has played against players with an average rank of 163.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pieri has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 32.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pieri has converted 48.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
414
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
793
Rank
773
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
54% (515-434)
Career Total W/L
59% (83-57)
20% (3-12)
YTD W/L
48% (11-12)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Gaio | Samuele Pieri |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (3/12) | 48% (11/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 23% (8/27) | 50% (26/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (133/195) | 49% (246/253) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 44% (7/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 58 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:12 | 1:57:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 221.27 | 140.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (588/1051) | 62% (998/1600) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (391/588) | 61% (610/998) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (213/463) | 46% (275/602) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (25/78) | 47% (77/164) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (358/1057) | 42% (626/1483) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 52% (11/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 14% (2/14) | 48% (11/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 78% (7/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 18% (11/2) |
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Player
Federico Gaio
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Federico Gaio
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Federico Gaio
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Karan Singh
43%
(
38 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Federico Gaio
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Samuele Pieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Samuele Pieri
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuele Pieri
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Carraro
Player
Samuele Pieri
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Samuele Pieri
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Samuele Pieri
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Potenza
Player
Samuele Pieri
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuele Pieri
Player
Max Houkes
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Samuele Pieri
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuele Pieri
Player
Niklas Schell
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Samuele Pieri
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaio Vs Pieri Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
